[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2e3b20d1-114b-4fbe-819c-437b1530db4f@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 16:12:09 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-fsi@...ts.ozlabs.org
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, joel@....id.au,
andrew@...econstruct.com.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/9] dt-bindings: fsi: fsi2spi: Document SPI controller
child nodes
On 15/05/2024 15:06, Eddie James wrote:
>
> On 5/15/24 03:14, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 14/05/2024 21:54, Eddie James wrote:
>>
>>> properties:
>>> compatible:
>>> @@ -24,6 +23,17 @@ properties:
>>> items:
>>> - description: FSI slave address
>>>
>>> + "#address-cells":
>>> + const: 1
>>> +
>>> + "#size-cells":
>>> + const: 0
>>> +
>>> +patternProperties:
>>> + "^spi@[0-9a-f]+$":
>>> + type: object
>>> + $ref: /schemas/spi/ibm,spi-fsi.yaml
>> Are you sure you do not have dependencies? Nothing was explained about
>> this in the cover letter or changelog.
>
>
> I did mention that it depends on the SPI binding change below the commit
> message in this patch. I guess I should have kept these two together...
Ah, I missed that. Yeah, you must keep them together or wait one more
cycle... Just test bisectability of your patchset.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists