[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <768c3e38-724a-42d7-a51d-16044bc69ed5@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 23:29:19 -0300
From: Marilene Andrade Garcia <marilene.agarcia@...il.com>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>, Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco.cruz@...il.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmem: meson-efuse: Replacing the use of of_node_put to
__free
On 15/04/2024 22:17, MarileneGarcia wrote:
> Use __free for device_node values, and thus drop calls to
> of_node_put.
>
> The goal is to reduce memory management issues by using this
> scope-based of_node_put() cleanup to simplify function exit
> handling. When using __free a resource is allocated within a
> block, it is automatically freed at the end of the block.
>
> Suggested-by: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>
> Signed-off-by: MarileneGarcia <marilene.agarcia@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvmem/meson-efuse.c | 5 ++---
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/meson-efuse.c b/drivers/nvmem/meson-efuse.c
> index 33678d0af2c2..400a9a075e53 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/meson-efuse.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/meson-efuse.c
> @@ -42,20 +42,19 @@ static int meson_efuse_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct meson_sm_firmware *fw;
> - struct device_node *sm_np;
> struct nvmem_device *nvmem;
> struct nvmem_config *econfig;
> struct clk *clk;
> unsigned int size;
> + struct device_node *sm_np __free(device_node) =
> + of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "secure-monitor", 0);
>
> - sm_np = of_parse_phandle(pdev->dev.of_node, "secure-monitor", 0);
> if (!sm_np) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no secure-monitor node\n");
> return -ENODEV;
> }
>
> fw = meson_sm_get(sm_np);
> - of_node_put(sm_np);
> if (!fw)
> return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>
Hello everyone,
Did you have a chance to look at the patch? Any questions or suggestions
about it?
Thank you,
Marilene
Powered by blists - more mailing lists