[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH5fLgjzVHSAQBF5-C1BthK1jspAGRr1z4SQXdQepkeVL9Eq2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 17:29:29 +0200
From: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>
To: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Todd Kjos <tkjos@...roid.com>, Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
Tim Murray <timmurray@...gle.com>, John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
Steven Moreland <smoreland@...gle.com>, Nick Chen <chenjia3@...o.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] binder: use bitmap for faster descriptor lookup
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 6:09 PM Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@...gle.com> wrote:
> +static inline int
> +dbitmap_get_first_zero_bit(struct dbitmap *dmap, unsigned long *bit)
> +{
> + unsigned long n;
> +
> + n = find_first_zero_bit(dmap->map, dmap->nbits);
> + if (unlikely(n == dmap->nbits))
> + return -ENOSPC;
> +
> + *bit = n;
> + set_bit(n, dmap->map);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Could we rename this method to something that makes it more clear that
it's not just a getter, but that it actually also sets the bit?
Alice
Powered by blists - more mailing lists