linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] mm/huge_memory: don't unpoison huge_zero

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e1c93779-8cde-4986-85d3-2134fb8970b3@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 17:55:39 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: shy828301@...il.com, nao.horiguchi@...il.com, xuyu@...ux.alibaba.com,
 linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mm/huge_memory: don't unpoison huge_zero_folio

On 15.05.24 04:36, Miaohe Lin wrote:
> When I did memory failure tests recently, below panic occurs:
> 
>   kernel BUG at include/linux/mm.h:1135!
>   invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
>   CPU: 9 PID: 137 Comm: kswapd1 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc4-00491-gd5ce28f156fe-dirty #14
>   RIP: 0010:shrink_huge_zero_page_scan+0x168/0x1a0
>   RSP: 0018:ffff9933c6c57bd0 EFLAGS: 00000246
>   RAX: 000000000000003e RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88f61fc5c9c8
>   RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000027 RDI: ffff88f61fc5c9c0
>   RBP: ffffcd7c446b0000 R08: ffffffff9a9405f0 R09: 0000000000005492
>   R10: 00000000000030ea R11: ffffffff9a9405f0 R12: 0000000000000000
>   R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88e703c4ac00
>   FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88f61fc40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>   CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>   CR2: 000055f4da6e9878 CR3: 0000000c71048000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
>   Call Trace:
>    <TASK>
>    do_shrink_slab+0x14f/0x6a0
>    shrink_slab+0xca/0x8c0
>    shrink_node+0x2d0/0x7d0
>    balance_pgdat+0x33a/0x720
>    kswapd+0x1f3/0x410
>    kthread+0xd5/0x100
>    ret_from_fork+0x2f/0x50
>    ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
>    </TASK>
>   Modules linked in: mce_inject hwpoison_inject
>   ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
>   RIP: 0010:shrink_huge_zero_page_scan+0x168/0x1a0
>   RSP: 0018:ffff9933c6c57bd0 EFLAGS: 00000246
>   RAX: 000000000000003e RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffff88f61fc5c9c8
>   RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000027 RDI: ffff88f61fc5c9c0
>   RBP: ffffcd7c446b0000 R08: ffffffff9a9405f0 R09: 0000000000005492
>   R10: 00000000000030ea R11: ffffffff9a9405f0 R12: 0000000000000000
>   R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff88e703c4ac00
>   FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88f61fc40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
>   CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
>   CR2: 000055f4da6e9878 CR3: 0000000c71048000 CR4: 00000000000006f0
> 
> The root cause is that HWPoison flag will be set for huge_zero_folio
> without increasing the folio refcnt. But then unpoison_memory() will
> decrease the folio refcnt unexpectly as it appears like a successfully
> hwpoisoned folio leading to VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_ref_count(page) == 0)
> when releasing huge_zero_folio.
> 
> Skip unpoisoning huge_zero_folio in unpoison_memory() to fix this issue.
> We're not prepared to unpoison huge_zero_folio yet.
> 
> Fixes: 478d134e9506 ("mm/huge_memory: do not overkill when splitting huge_zero_page")
> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> ---
> v2:
>   Change to simply check for the huge zero page. Thanks.
> ---
>   mm/memory-failure.c | 6 ++++++
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index 16ada4fb02b7..68bc8d7ff53d 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -2558,6 +2558,12 @@ int unpoison_memory(unsigned long pfn)
>   		goto unlock_mutex;
>   	}
>   
> +	if (is_huge_zero_folio(folio)) {
> +		unpoison_pr_info("Unpoison: huge zero page is not supported %#lx\n",
> +				 pfn, &unpoison_rs);
> +		goto unlock_mutex;
> +	}
> +
>   	if (folio_test_slab(folio) || folio_test_pgtable(folio) ||
>   	    folio_test_reserved(folio) || folio_test_offline(folio))
>   		goto unlock_mutex;

Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>

-- 
Cheers,

David / dhildenb