[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240515161835.69311-1-sj@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 09:18:35 -0700
From: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>
To: Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@...com>
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
damon@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hyeongtak Ji <hyeongtak.ji@...com>,
Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@...com>,
kernel_team@...ynix.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 0/5] DAMON based tiered memory management for CXL memory
Hi Honggyu,
On Mon, 13 May 2024 20:59:15 +0900 Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@...com> wrote:
> Hi SeongJae,
>
> Thanks very much for your work! It got delayed due to the priority
> changes in my workplace for building another heterogeneous memory
> allocator.
> https://github.com/skhynix/hmsdk/wiki/hmalloc
No problem at all. We all work on our own schedule and nobody can chase/push
anybody :)
>
> On Sun, 12 May 2024 10:54:42 -0700 SeongJae Park <sj@...nel.org> wrote:
> > There was an RFC IDEA "DAMOS-based Tiered-Memory Management" previously
> > posted at [1].
> >
> > It says there is no implementation of the demote/promote DAMOS action
> > are made. This RFC is about its implementation for physical address
> > space.
> >
> > Changes from RFC v3
> > (https://lore.kernel.org/20240405060858.2818-1-honggyu.kim@sk.com):
>
> This link cannot be opened. I will share the link again here.
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240405060858.2818-1-honggyu.kim@sk.com
Thank you for checking the link! It's weird though, since I can open the link
on my Chrome browser.
>
> > 0. updated from v3 and posted by SJ on behalf of Hunggyu under his
> > approval.
> > 1. Do not reuse damon_pa_pageout() and drop 'enum migration_mode'
> > 2. Drop vmstat change
>
> I haven't checked whether I can collect useful information without
> vmstat, but the changes look good in general except for that.
I was thinking you could use DAMOS stat[1] for the schemes and assuming no
reply to it as an agreement, but maybe I should made it clear. Do you think
DAMOS stat cannot be used instead? If so, what would be the limitation of
DAMOS stat for your usage?
>
> > 3. Drop unnecessary page reference check
>
> I will compare this patch series with my previous v3 patchset and get
> back to you later maybe next week.
Thank you very much! Unless I get a good enough test setup and results from it
on my own or from others' help, your test result would be the last requirement
for dropping RFC from this patchset.
> Sorry, I will have another break this week.
No problem, I hope you to have nice break. Nobody can chase/push others. We
all do this work voluntarily for our own fun and profit, right? ;)
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/damon/20240405060858.2818-1-honggyu.kim@sk.com
Thanks,
SJ
>
> Thanks,
> Honggyu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists