[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjntFiQ=mM-zDHTMnrqki3MN3+6aSXhjnJozBaKqLLUDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 09:20:48 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>, Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/243] 6.1.91-rc2 review
On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 09:17, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> A bisect claims that "net: bcmgenet:
> synchronize EXT_RGMII_OOB_CTRL access" is the first commit that breaks,
> I'm not seeing issues with other stables.
That's d85cf67a3396 ("net: bcmgenet: synchronize EXT_RGMII_OOB_CTRL
access") upstream. Is upstream ok?
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists