[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240515-reorder-even-8b9eebd91b45@spud>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 17:30:03 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Xingyu Wu <xingyu.wu@...rfivetech.com>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Emil Renner Berthing <emil.renner.berthing@...onical.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Hal Feng <hal.feng@...rfivetech.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] Add notifier for PLL0 clock and set it 1.5GHz on
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 02:23:47AM +0000, Xingyu Wu wrote:
> On 15/05/2024 02:08, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > There's a push in U-Boot to move devicestrees to use "OF_UPSTREAM", which
> > means importing devicetrees directly from Linux and using them in U-Boot. I
> > don't really want to merge a patch that would present U-Boot with a problem if
> > the VisionFive 2 moved to that model there.
> Would it be better if I change the rates of PLL0 and CPU core in the driver not dts,
> and avoid the dts of Linux and U-Boot being different?
I'd definitely prefer if we don't include stuff in the kernel tree that
would cause problems for U-Boot if imported there, yeah.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists