[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0357ee6b-868f-47f9-9554-48039d674ab4@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 17:42:09 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de,
conor@...nel.org, allen.lkml@...il.com,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Doug Berger <opendmb@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/243] 6.1.91-rc2 review
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 09:20:48AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 09:17, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> > A bisect claims that "net: bcmgenet:
> > synchronize EXT_RGMII_OOB_CTRL access" is the first commit that breaks,
> > I'm not seeing issues with other stables.
> That's d85cf67a3396 ("net: bcmgenet: synchronize EXT_RGMII_OOB_CTRL
> access") upstream. Is upstream ok?
Yes, it seems fine in this regard (I am seeing some performance related
issues later on which trigger timeouts during tests but I'm fairly sure
they're infrastructure and they're definitely well after this issue
manifests).
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists