linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 1/7] sched/isolation: Add infrastructure to adjust affinity for dynamic CPU isolation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240516190437.3545310-2-costa.shul@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 22:04:31 +0300
From: Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@...hat.com>
To: longman@...hat.com,
	pauld@...hat.com,
	juri.lelli@...hat.com,
	prarit@...hat.com,
	vschneid@...hat.com,
	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
	Yoann Congal <yoann.congal@...le.fr>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
	Nhat Pham <nphamcs@...il.com>,
	Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/7] sched/isolation: Add infrastructure to adjust affinity for dynamic CPU isolation

Introduce infrastructure function housekeeping_update() to change
housekeeping_cpumask during runtime and adjust affinities of depended
subsystems.

Affinity adjustments of subsystems follow in subsequent patches.

Parent patch:
"sched/isolation: Exclude dynamically isolated CPUs from housekeeping masks"
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240229021414.508972-2-longman@redhat.com/

Test example for cgroup2:

cd /sys/fs/cgroup/
echo +cpuset > cgroup.subtree_control
mkdir test
echo isolated > test/cpuset.cpus.partition
echo $isolate > test/cpuset.cpus

Signed-off-by: Costa Shulyupin <costa.shul@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/sched/isolation.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/isolation.c b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
index 948b9ee0dc2cc..036e48f0e7d1b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/isolation.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/isolation.c
@@ -116,6 +116,39 @@ static void __init housekeeping_setup_type(enum hk_type type,
 		     housekeeping_staging);
 }
 
+/*
+ * housekeeping_update - change housekeeping.cpumasks[type] and propagate the
+ * change.
+ *
+ * Assuming cpuset_mutex is held in sched_partition_write or
+ * cpuset_write_resmask.
+ */
+static int housekeeping_update(enum hk_type type, cpumask_var_t update)
+{
+	struct {
+		struct cpumask changed;
+		struct cpumask enable;
+		struct cpumask disable;
+	} *masks;
+
+	masks = kmalloc(sizeof(*masks), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!masks)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
+	cpumask_xor(&masks->changed, housekeeping_cpumask(type), update);
+	cpumask_and(&masks->enable, &masks->changed, update);
+	cpumask_andnot(&masks->disable, &masks->changed, update);
+	cpumask_copy(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], update);
+	housekeeping.flags |= BIT(type);
+	if (!static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overridden))
+		static_key_enable_cpuslocked(&housekeeping_overridden.key);
+
+	kfree(masks);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static int __init housekeeping_setup(char *str, unsigned long flags)
 {
 	cpumask_var_t non_housekeeping_mask, housekeeping_staging;
@@ -314,9 +347,12 @@ int housekeeping_exlude_isolcpus(const struct cpumask *isolcpus, unsigned long f
 		/*
 		 * Reset housekeeping to bootup default
 		 */
-		for_each_set_bit(type, &housekeeping_boot.flags, HK_TYPE_MAX)
-			cpumask_copy(housekeeping.cpumasks[type],
-				     housekeeping_boot.cpumasks[type]);
+		for_each_set_bit(type, &housekeeping_boot.flags, HK_TYPE_MAX) {
+			int err = housekeeping_update(type, housekeeping_boot.cpumasks[type]);
+
+			if (err)
+				return err;
+		}
 
 		WRITE_ONCE(housekeeping.flags, housekeeping_boot.flags);
 		if (!housekeeping_boot.flags &&
@@ -344,9 +380,11 @@ int housekeeping_exlude_isolcpus(const struct cpumask *isolcpus, unsigned long f
 		cpumask_andnot(tmp_mask, src_mask, isolcpus);
 		if (!cpumask_intersects(tmp_mask, cpu_online_mask))
 			return -EINVAL;	/* Invalid isolated CPUs */
-		cpumask_copy(housekeeping.cpumasks[type], tmp_mask);
+		int err = housekeeping_update(type, tmp_mask);
+
+		if (err)
+			return err;
 	}
-	WRITE_ONCE(housekeeping.flags, housekeeping_boot.flags | flags);
 	excluded = true;
 	if (!static_branch_unlikely(&housekeeping_overridden))
 		static_key_enable_cpuslocked(&housekeeping_overridden.key);
-- 
2.45.0