linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the modules tree with the mm tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 09:26:07 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton
 <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@...nel.org>,
 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the modules tree with the mm tree

Hi all,

On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 12:20:34 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the modules tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   c22e503ced5b ("fix missing vmalloc.h includes")
> 
> from the mm-unstable branch of the mm tree and commit:
> 
>   7aa7eb8269ea ("arch: make execmem setup available regardless of CONFIG_MODULES")
> 
> from the modules tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> index a197d4c2244b,5de62a3c1d4b..000000000000
> --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> @@@ -16,7 -16,7 +16,8 @@@
>   #include <linux/highmem.h>
>   #include <linux/suspend.h>
>   #include <linux/dma-direct.h>
>  +#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> + #include <linux/execmem.h>
>   
>   #include <asm/swiotlb.h>
>   #include <asm/machdep.h>

This is now a conflict between the mm-stable tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped