linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: spi: brcm,bcm2835-spi: convert to dtschema

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 12:00:29 +0530
From: Kanak Shilledar <kanakshilledar@...il.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: wahrenst@....net, Kanak Shilledar <kanakshilledar111@...tonmail.com>, 
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, 
	Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>, Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>, 
	Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>, 
	Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: spi: brcm,bcm2835-spi: convert to dtschema

On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:44 PM Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 12:30:47PM +0530, Kanak Shilledar wrote:
>
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Updated DCO email address
>
> I was really hoping you'd tell me why you'd not used the same email
> address, rather than just sending another version. My ulterior motive is
> that I wrote the section in email-clients.rst saying that protonmail had
> WKD issues with kernel.org accounts but apparently proton added a
> workaround and have yet to be sent an email that confirmed that the
> workaround fixed things. (I'm not sure that the WKD issues ever applied
> as there's no GPG key posted for conor+dt@...nel.org, only
> conor@...nel.org).

Oh, I am primarily using protonmail and I am aware that there are some
issues with protonmail and kernel.org so for that reason I am sending my
patches via @gmail.com address. I was trying out some things with
gmail and proton so had changed my signing email address to @gmail.com
apart from sending emails I have no motive on using gmail.com account.
Also I am adding my protonmail account in the `CC`.
Hope this helps.
If this is not the intended route then I will change it and stick
to one email address.

> The patch is fine IMO though, so
> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>

Do I need to roll out another version with this reviewed by flag?
> Cheers,
> Conor.


Thanks and Regards
Kanak Shilledar