[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240516082713.GC179178@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 09:27:13 +0100
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>
Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>,
Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
igor.bagnucki@...el.com, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net 3/3] ice: map XDP queues to vectors in
ice_vsi_map_rings_to_vectors()
On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 06:02:16PM +0200, Larysa Zaremba wrote:
> ice_pf_dcb_recfg() re-maps queues to vectors with
> ice_vsi_map_rings_to_vectors(), which does not restore the previous
> state for XDP queues. This leads to no AF_XDP traffic after rebuild.
>
> Map XDP queues to vectors in ice_vsi_map_rings_to_vectors().
> Also, move the code around, so XDP queues are mapped independently only
> through .ndo_bpf().
Hi Larysa,
I take it the last sentence refers to the placement of ice_map_xdp_rings()
in ice_prepare_xdp_rings() after rather than before the
(cfg_type == ICE_XDP_CFG_PART) condition.
If so, I see that it is a small change. But I do wonder if it is separate
from fixing the issue described in the first paragraph. And thus would
be better as a separate patch.
Also, (I'm raising a separate issue :) breaking out logic into
ice_xdp_ring_from_qid() seems very nice. But I wonder if this ought to be
part of a cleanup-patch for 'iwl' rather than a fixes patch for 'iwl-next'.
OTOH, I do see that breaking out ice_map_xdp_rings() makes sense in the
context of this fix as the same logic is to be called in two places.
Splitting patches aside, the resulting code looks good to me.
..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists