linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mtd: nand: mxc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240516103321.25b49576@xps-13>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 10:33:21 +0200
From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Vignesh Raghavendra
 <vigneshr@...com>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] mtd: nand: mxc_nand: support software ECC

Hi Sascha,

> > +	/*
> > +	 * During a page write the i.MX NAND controller will read 512b from
> > +	 * main_area0 SRAM, then oob_per_subpage bytes from spare0 SRAM, then
> > +	 * 512b from main_area1 SRAM and so on until the full page is written.
> > +	 * For software ECC we want to have a 1:1 mapping between the raw page
> > +	 * data on the NAND chip and the view of the NAND core. This is
> > +	 * necessary to make the NAND_CMD_RNDOUT read the data it expects.
> > +	 * To accomplish this we have to write the data in the order the controller
> > +	 * reads it. This is reversed in copy_page_from_sram() below.
> > +	 */
> > +	for (i = 0; i < no_subpages; i++) {
> > +		memcpy16_toio(host->main_area0 + i * 512, buf, 512);
> > +		buf += 512;
> > +
> > +		memcpy16_toio(host->spare0 + i * host->devtype_data->spare_len, buf,
> > +			      oob_per_subpage);
> > +		buf += oob_per_subpage;
> > +	}
> > +}  
> 
> I noticed the nandbiterr test won't work with this. It needs the following
> fixup. The problem is that the core wants to write only user data
> without OOB, so we have to make sure the remaining SRAM is filled up
> with 0xff.

Yes. I looked rapidly at the diff, looks ok.

Thanks,
Miquèl