linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] perf maps: Improve the kcore maps merging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55f6701e-9a37-4cce-b063-af6e1776245e@foss.arm.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 09:55:51 +0100
From: Leo Yan <niayan01@...s.arm.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
 Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
 Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
 Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
 Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
 linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] perf maps: Improve the kcore maps merging

Hi Ian,

On 5/15/24 22:39, Ian Rogers wrote:

[...]

> Thanks Leo, testing this change on perf-tools-next with an x86 debian
> laptop I see:
> ```
> $ perf test 24 -v
> 24: Object code reading:
> --- start ---
> test child forked, pid 3407499
> Looking at the vmlinux_path (8 entries long)
> symsrc__init: build id mismatch for vmlinux.
> symsrc__init: cannot get elf header.
> overlapping maps in [kernel.kallsyms] (disable tui for more info)
> Using /proc/kcore for kernel data
> Using /proc/kallsyms for symbols
> Parsing event 'cycles'
> Using CPUID GenuineIntel-6-8D-1
> mmap size 528384B
> Reading object code for memory address: 0xfffffffface8d64a
> File is: /proc/kcore
> On file address is: 0xfffffffface8d64a
> dso__data_read_offset failed
> ---- end(-1) ----
> 24: Object code reading                                             : FAILED!
> ```
> The test passes without the changes. Let me know if you need me to dig deeper.

I can reproduce this test failure at my side. I will look into it.

Thanks for testing!

Leo