[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZkXQ5h8fla1KhX6A@zeus>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 18:24:54 +0900
From: Ryosuke Yasuoka <ryasuoka@...hat.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: krzk@...nel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, syoshida@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] nfc: nci: Fix handling of zero-length payload
packets in nci_rx_work()
Thank you for your review and comment, Simon.
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 09:43:48AM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> Hi Yasuoka-san,
>
> On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 12:17:07AM +0900, Ryosuke Yasuoka wrote:
> > When nci_rx_work() receives a zero-length payload packet, it should
> > discard the packet without exiting the loop. Instead, it should continue
> > processing subsequent packets.
>
> nit: I think it would be clearer to say:
>
> ... it should not discard the packet and exit the loop. Instead, ...
Great. I'll update commit msg like this.
> >
> > Fixes: d24b03535e5e ("nfc: nci: Fix uninit-value in nci_dev_up and nci_ntf_packet")
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240428134525.GW516117@kernel.org/T/
>
> nit: I'm not sure this Closes link is adding much,
> there are more changes coming, right?
No. I just wanna show the URL link as a reference where this bug is
found. This URL discuss a little bit different topic as you know.
In the following discussion [1], Jakub pointed out that changing
continue statement to break is not related to the patch "Fix
uninit-value in nci_rw_work". So I posted this new small patch before
posting v5 patch for "Fix: uninit-value in nci_rw_work".
If Closes tag is not appropriate, I can remove this in this v2 patch.
What do you think?
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240510190613.72838bf0@kernel.org/
> > Reported-by: Ryosuke Yasuoka <ryasuoka@...hat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ryosuke Yasuoka <ryasuoka@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > net/nfc/nci/core.c | 3 +--
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/core.c b/net/nfc/nci/core.c
> > index b133dc55304c..f2ae8b0d81b9 100644
> > --- a/net/nfc/nci/core.c
> > +++ b/net/nfc/nci/core.c
> > @@ -1518,8 +1518,7 @@ static void nci_rx_work(struct work_struct *work)
> >
> > if (!nci_plen(skb->data)) {
> > kfree_skb(skb);
> > - kcov_remote_stop();
> > - break;
> > + continue;
> > }
> >
> > /* Process frame */
> > --
> > 2.44.0
> >
> >
>
Thank you for your help.
Ryosuke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists