[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ce6d7e6a-e24a-43b4-a9b8-4e946277c2d8@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 12:36:21 +0200
From: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, John Garry <john.g.garry@...cle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...ux.dev>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: perf: arm64: Catch all Arm files and folders
On 16/05/2024 06:35, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>
>
> On 5/15/24 20:42, James Clark wrote:
>> Catch all files and folders with Arm in the name in tools/perf/ up to
>> two levels deep. There currently no false positives.
>>
>> This catches lots of missing items like these and more:
>>
>> * util/arm-spe-decoder/
>> (The existing util/arm-spe* entry only matched files not folders)
>> * util/perf-regs-arch/perf_regs_arm.c
>> * scripts/python/arm-cs-trace-disasm.py
>> * tests/shell/test_arm_spe.sh
>
> Agreed.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
>> ---
>> MAINTAINERS | 7 ++++---
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>> index ec0284125e8f..c5d0256d32dd 100644
>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>> @@ -17318,9 +17318,10 @@ R: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...ux.dev>
>> L: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
>> S: Supported
>> F: tools/build/feature/test-libopencsd.c
>> -F: tools/perf/arch/arm*/
>> -F: tools/perf/pmu-events/arch/arm64/
>> -F: tools/perf/util/arm-spe*
>> +F: tools/perf/*/*/*arm*
>> +F: tools/perf/*/*/*arm*/
>> +F: tools/perf/*/*arm*
>> +F: tools/perf/*/*arm*/
>> F: tools/perf/util/cs-etm*
>
> Very minor nit, these regular expressions should be arranged as per
> the increasing directory depth levels, just to make it apparent in
> terms of which files are being covered here ?
>
> F: tools/perf/*/*arm*
> F: tools/perf/*/*arm*/
> F: tools/perf/*/*/*arm*
> F: tools/perf/*/*/*arm*/
>
Checkpatch has an alphabetical sort which says they have to be the other
way around, but yes I agree I did write it your way initially.
> But regardless, with or without the above changes
>
> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
>
>>
>> PERSONALITY HANDLING
Powered by blists - more mailing lists