linux-kernel - Re: clkdev: report over-sized strings when creating clkdev entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <29f30eda-deba-4092-9b4c-8cb101b8691d@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 12:57:53 +0200
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
To: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>, "Russell King (Oracle)"
	<linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Linux
	ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, linux-clk
	<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, open list
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, Michael Turquette
	<mturquette@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: clkdev: report over-sized strings when creating clkdev entries

On 16.05.2024 12:27, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Wed, 15 May 2024 at 22:53, Russell King (Oracle)
> <linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 07, 2024 at 01:26:17PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Quoting Arnd Bergmann (2024-05-07 00:44:15)
>>>> On Tue, May 7, 2024, at 09:20, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>>>>> The WinLink E850-96 board boot failed with Linux next-20240506 but there
>>>>> is no kernel crash log on the serial [1].
>>>>>
>>>>> Anders bisection results pointing to this commit,
>>>>> # first bad commit:
>>>>>    [4d11c62ca8d77cb1f79054844b598e0f4e92dabe]
>>>>>    clkdev: report over-sized strings when creating clkdev entrie
>>>>>
>>>>> After reverting the above patch the boot test passed [2].
>>>>>
>>>>> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>
>>>>>
>>> There are two fixes on the list: [1] and [2]. Perhaps one of those
>>> resolves this?
>>>
>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240507065317.3214186-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com
>> This one has (I think) ended up in the patch system last week, but it's
>> not clkdev, it's only related. I'm also not Cc'd on its posting, and
>> it's not posted to any mailing list that I'm a part of. So I've not
>> been following any discussion on it.
>>
>> Digging in to the discussion, I see various attributations, and a final
>> message reporting an unused variable, and a promise to send v2. So,
>> I'm guessing that
>> https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=946226d9-f5e933ef-9463ad96-74fe485fffe0-28286a0026513387&q=1&e=a16c1c53-9c99-475a-b144-8adf7852ebc0&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.home.armlinux.org.uk%2Fdeveloper%2Fpatches%2Fviewpatch.php%3Fid%3D9397%2F1
> I do not have access to this link ^.
>
>> is now superseded in some way... I wouldn't have known without locating
>> this email and checking the links.


The fix for drivers/clk/samsung/clk.c driver has been merged to clk-next:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/f7a877622829db499bf2bc65fe9ffbff.sboyd@kernel.org/

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland