[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f7cf4ac0-afa2-4f64-818b-1275b1e8a6ee@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 12:33:36 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Matti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@...il.com>
Cc: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] regulator: don't cache vsel to ensure voltage setting
On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 11:53:46AM +0300, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> + /*
> + * Some PMICs treat the vsel_reg same as apply-bit. Force it
> + * to be written even if the old selector were same as the new
> + * (but range changed) by using regmap_write_bits() and not the
> + * regmap_update_bits().
> + */
> + ret = regmap_write_bits(rdev->regmap, rdev->desc->vsel_reg,
> + rdev->desc->vsel_mask, sel);
This feels like a special case for those devices, for devices that don't
have this behaviour it'd be a regression in that it'd increase I/O
traffic. At least this should be specialised to only devices that have
ranges I think?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists