[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b6e8f705-e4ab-4709-bf18-c8767f63f92e@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 14:10:41 +1200
From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>
To: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>, "Yamahata, Isaku"
<isaku.yamahata@...el.com>
CC: "dmatlack@...gle.com" <dmatlack@...gle.com>, "seanjc@...gle.com"
<seanjc@...gle.com>, "sagis@...gle.com" <sagis@...gle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Zhao, Yan Y"
<yan.y.zhao@...el.com>, "Aktas, Erdem" <erdemaktas@...gle.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, "pbonzini@...hat.com"
<pbonzini@...hat.com>, "isaku.yamahata@...il.com" <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/16] KVM: x86/tdp_mmu: Support TDX private mapping for
TDP MMU
>>>> + gfn_t raw_gfn;
>>>> + bool is_private = fault->is_private && kvm_gfn_shared_mask(kvm);
>>>
>>> Ditto. I wish we can have 'has_mirrored_private_pt'.
>>
>> Which name do you prefer? has_mirrored_pt or has_mirrored_private_pt?
>
> Why not helpers that wrap vm_type like:
> https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/d4c96caffd2633a70a140861d91794cdb54c7655.camel@intel.com/
I am fine with any of them -- boolean (with either name) or helper.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists