linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: Remove legacy API documentation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZkYQHnF76WLIf8-r@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 16:54:38 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...cle.com>,
	Kent Gibson <warthog618@...il.com>,
	Hu Haowen <2023002089@...k.tyut.edu.cn>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Alex Shi <alexs@...nel.org>,
	Yanteng Si <siyanteng@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: Remove legacy API documentation

On Wed, May 08, 2024 at 01:17:01PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> In order to discourage people to use old and legacy GPIO APIs
> remove the respective documentation completely. It also helps
> further cleanups of the legacy GPIO API leftovers, which is
> ongoing task.

Bart, Linus, Kent, what do you think about this?

If there is a positive consensus, I would even dare to go for v6.10-rc2
with it.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko