| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 22:00:12 +0800
From: Andy Chiu <andy.chiu@...ive.com>
To: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, Evan Green <evan@...osinc.com>,
Clément Léger <cleger@...osinc.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 03/17] riscv: vector: Use vlenb from DT
Sorry Charlie, I forgot to include the mailing list. Here is the same as
what I sent in the private message.
On Sat, May 4, 2024 at 2:21 AM Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com> wrote:
>
> If vlenb is provided in the device tree, prefer that over reading the
> vlenb csr.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 ++
> arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/riscv/kernel/vector.c | 12 +++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index 347805446151..0c4f08577015 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -31,6 +31,8 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct riscv_cpuinfo, riscv_cpuinfo);
> /* Per-cpu ISA extensions. */
> extern struct riscv_isainfo hart_isa[NR_CPUS];
>
> +extern u32 riscv_vlenb_of;
> +
> void riscv_user_isa_enable(void);
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_RISCV_MISALIGNED)
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 3ed2359eae35..6c143ea9592b 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -35,6 +35,8 @@ static DECLARE_BITMAP(riscv_isa, RISCV_ISA_EXT_MAX) __read_mostly;
> /* Per-cpu ISA extensions. */
> struct riscv_isainfo hart_isa[NR_CPUS];
>
> +u32 riscv_vlenb_of;
> +
> /**
> * riscv_isa_extension_base() - Get base extension word
> *
> @@ -648,6 +650,46 @@ static int __init riscv_isa_fallback_setup(char *__unused)
> early_param("riscv_isa_fallback", riscv_isa_fallback_setup);
> #endif
>
> +static int has_riscv_homogeneous_vlenb(void)
> +{
> + int cpu;
> + u32 prev_vlenb = 0;
> + u32 vlenb;
> +
> + /* Ignore vlenb if vector is not enabled in the kernel */
> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_V))
> + return 0;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + struct device_node *cpu_node;
> +
> + cpu_node = of_cpu_device_node_get(cpu);
> + if (!cpu_node) {
> + pr_warn("Unable to find cpu node\n");
> + return -ENOENT;
> + }
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u32(cpu_node, "riscv,vlenb", &vlenb)) {
> + of_node_put(cpu_node);
> +
> + if (prev_vlenb)
> + return -ENOENT;
> + continue;
> + }
> +
> + if (prev_vlenb && vlenb != prev_vlenb) {
> + of_node_put(cpu_node);
> + return -ENOENT;
> + }
> +
> + prev_vlenb = vlenb;
> + of_node_put(cpu_node);
> + }
> +
> + riscv_vlenb_of = vlenb;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> void __init riscv_fill_hwcap(void)
> {
> char print_str[NUM_ALPHA_EXTS + 1];
> @@ -671,6 +713,11 @@ void __init riscv_fill_hwcap(void)
> pr_info("Falling back to deprecated \"riscv,isa\"\n");
> riscv_fill_hwcap_from_isa_string(isa2hwcap);
> }
> +
> + if (elf_hwcap & COMPAT_HWCAP_ISA_V && has_riscv_homogeneous_vlenb() < 0) {
> + pr_warn("Unsupported heterogeneous vlen detected, vector extension disabled.\> + elf_hwcap &= ~COMPAT_HWCAP_ISA_V;
> + }
We only touch COMPAT_HWCAP_ISA_V and the failed case only turns off the
rectified V. So here we have nothing to do with the Xtheadvector.
However, I am still confused because I think Xtheadvector would also
need to call into this check, so as to setup vlenb.
Apart from that, it seems like some vendor stating Xtheadvector is
actually vector-0.7. Please correct me if I speak anything wrong. One
thing I noticed is that Xtheadvector wouldn't trap on reading
th.vlenb but vector-0.7 would. If that is the case, should we require
Xtheadvector to specify `riscv,vlenb` on the device tree?
> }
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/vector.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/vector.c
> index 6727d1d3b8f2..e04586cdb7f0 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/vector.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/vector.c
> @@ -33,7 +33,17 @@ int riscv_v_setup_vsize(void)
> {
> unsigned long this_vsize;
>
> - /* There are 32 vector registers with vlenb length. */
> + /*
> + * There are 32 vector registers with vlenb length.
> + *
> + * If the riscv,vlenb property was provided by the firmware, use that
> + * instead of probing the CSRs.
> + */
> + if (riscv_vlenb_of) {
> + this_vsize = riscv_vlenb_of * 32;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> riscv_v_enable();
> this_vsize = csr_read(CSR_VLENB) * 32;
> riscv_v_disable();
>
> --
> 2.44.0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
Thanks,
Andy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists