[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2e5ad8c3-4889-4062-964b-acf4ec75986c@foss.st.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 18:32:15 +0200
From: Patrick DELAUNAY <patrick.delaunay@...s.st.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>, Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
CC: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Liam Girdwood
<lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Pascal
Paillet <p.paillet@...s.st.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: regulator: st,stm32mp1-pwr-reg: add
compatible for STM32MP13
Hi,
On 5/15/24 18:15, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 05:37:49PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 5/15/24 5:35 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 04:33:22PM +0200, Patrick DELAUNAY wrote:
>>>> with
>>>>
>>>> compatible:
>>>> oneOf:
>>>> - items:
>>>> - const: st,stm32mp1,pwr-reg
>>>> - items:
>>>> - const: st,stm32mp13-pwr-reg
>>>> - const: st,stm32mp1,pwr-reg
>>> Other than the extra ,s this looks okay, thanks.
>> I think the extra ,s are actually correct, those are the ones from the
>> original compatible which had TWO ,s (it does look a bit unusual).
> Oh my bad then.
Ok, I prepare a V4 with fallback
and comma in compatible "st,stm32mp1,pwr-reg" was clearly an error
but it is too late to change it, see [1]
[1] ARM: st: use a correct pwr compatible for stm32mp15
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/list/?series=847733&state=*
regards
Patrick
Powered by blists - more mailing lists