[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fUmH74Bbbm40oqDynDQL+GUi7iFKjHKSKc5-dPafqifzA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 09:44:45 -0700
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: weilin.wang@...el.com
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Perry Taylor <perry.taylor@...el.com>, Samantha Alt <samantha.alt@...el.com>,
Caleb Biggers <caleb.biggers@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v8 4/7] perf stat: Add retire latency values into the
expr_parse_ctx to prepare for final metric calculation
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 10:44 PM <weilin.wang@...el.com> wrote:
>
> From: Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@...el.com>
>
> Retire latency values of events are used in metric formulas. This update adds
> code to process data from perf record for required retire latency values.
>
> Signed-off-by: Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
In the evsel approach:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240428053616.1125891-1-irogers@google.com/
we don't need to special case tpebs events like this. I'd prefer we
went that route. My reviewed-by no longer stands.
Thanks,
Ian
> ---
> tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c b/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c
> index 3466aa952442..b97d23bfeac1 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/stat-shadow.c
> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
> #include <linux/zalloc.h>
> #include "iostat.h"
> #include "util/hashmap.h"
> +#include "util/intel-tpebs.h"
>
> struct stats walltime_nsecs_stats;
> struct rusage_stats ru_stats;
> @@ -355,6 +356,20 @@ static void print_nsecs(struct perf_stat_config *config,
> print_metric(config, ctxp, NULL, NULL, "CPUs utilized", 0);
> }
>
> +static int prepare_retire_lat(struct expr_parse_ctx *pctx,
> + struct list_head *retire_lats)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + struct tpebs_retire_lat *t;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(t, retire_lats, nd) {
> + ret = expr__add_id_val(pctx, strdup(t->tpebs_name), t->val);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + }
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> static int prepare_metric(const struct metric_expr *mexp,
> const struct evsel *evsel,
> struct expr_parse_ctx *pctx,
> @@ -369,6 +384,9 @@ static int prepare_metric(const struct metric_expr *mexp,
> double val;
> int source_count = 0;
>
> + if (metric_events[i]->retire_lat)
> + continue;
> +
> if (evsel__is_tool(metric_events[i])) {
> struct stats *stats;
> double scale;
> @@ -486,6 +504,11 @@ static void generic_metric(struct perf_stat_config *config,
> pctx->sctx.user_requested_cpu_list = strdup(config->user_requested_cpu_list);
> pctx->sctx.runtime = runtime;
> pctx->sctx.system_wide = config->system_wide;
> + i = prepare_retire_lat(pctx, &config->tpebs_results);
> + if (i < 0) {
> + expr__ctx_free(pctx);
> + return;
> + }
> i = prepare_metric(mexp, evsel, pctx, aggr_idx);
> if (i < 0) {
> expr__ctx_free(pctx);
> --
> 2.43.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists