linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH] uprobe: support for private hugetlb mappings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZkZGGkxXNaF5JPQ5@bender.morinfr.org>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 19:44:58 +0200
From: Guillaume Morin <guillaume@...infr.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: oleg@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, muchun.song@...ux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] uprobe: support for private hugetlb mappings

On 02 May  5:59, Guillaume Morin wrote:
>
> On 30 Apr 21:25, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> > > I tried to get the hugepd stuff right but this was the first I heard
> > > about it :-) Afaict follow_huge_pmd and friends were already DTRT
> > 
> > I'll have to have a closer look at some details (the hugepd writability
> > check looks a bit odd), but it's mostly what I would have expected!
> 
> Ok in the meantime, here is the uprobe change on your current
> uprobes_cow trying to address the comments you made in your previous
> message. Some of them were not 100% clear to me, so it's a best effort
> patch :-) Again lightly tested

David, have you had a chance to take a look at both patches?

-- 
Guillaume Morin <guillaume@...infr.org>