lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <171598257778.92588.12559383850942329483.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 22:49:37 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>
Cc: linux@...ck-us.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: kunit: Fix array overflow in stride() test

On Fri, 17 May 2024 15:47:03 +0100, Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
> Force the max_register of the test regmap to be one register longer
> than the number of test registers, to prevent an array overflow in
> the test loop.
> 
> The test defines num_reg_defaults = 6. With 6 registers and
> stride == 2 the valid register addresses would be 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10.
> However the loop checks attempting to access the odd address, so on
> the final register it accesses address 11, and it writes entry [11]
> of the read/written arrays.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regmap.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regmap: kunit: Fix array overflow in stride() test
      commit: 7ba822189e6060a8a2833b721d430f833bf0db43

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ