[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <edfb049a-b56e-424f-bca7-556dffa6c87d@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 10:58:18 +0200
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Chris Lew <quic_clew@...cinc.com>, Bjorn Andersson
<andersson@...nel.org>, Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Richard Maina <quic_rmaina@...cinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] hwspinlock: Introduce refcount
On 17/05/2024 00:58, Chris Lew wrote:
> + unsigned int refcnt;
Why int and not refcount_t ?
Have you an argument for or against use of one over another ?
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists