[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <39b66355-f67e-49e9-a64b-fdd87340f787@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 11:11:30 +0200
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: linux@...blig.org, Frank.li@....com, vkoul@...nel.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dmaengine: qcom: gpi: remove unused struct 'reg_info'
On 16/05/2024 17:25, linux@...blig.org wrote:
> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@...blig.org>
>
> Remove unused struct 'reg_info'
>
> Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@...blig.org>
> ---
> drivers/dma/qcom/gpi.c | 6 ------
> 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/qcom/gpi.c b/drivers/dma/qcom/gpi.c
> index 1c93864e0e4d..639ab304db9b 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/qcom/gpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/qcom/gpi.c
> @@ -476,12 +476,6 @@ struct gpi_dev {
> struct gpii *gpiis;
> };
>
> -struct reg_info {
> - char *name;
> - u32 offset;
> - u32 val;
> -};
> -
> struct gchan {
> struct virt_dma_chan vc;
> u32 chid;
More detail in the commit log please - is the structure unused ? What is
the provenance of it being added and becoming dead code.
More detail required here.
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists