linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Address clang -Wimplicit-fallthrough in vsprintf()

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 11:51:10 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	llvm@...ts.linux.dev, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
	kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: Address clang -Wimplicit-fallthrough in
 vsprintf()

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 07:03:41AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> After enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough for the x86 boot code, clang
> warns:
> 
>   arch/x86/boot/printf.c:257:3: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels [-Wimplicit-fallthrough]
>     257 |                 case 'u':
>         |                 ^
> 
> Clang is a little more pedantic than GCC, which does not warn when
> falling through to a case that is just break or return.

Is anyone fixing Clang?

:-P

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette