linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sdx75-idp: add SDHCI for SD Card

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7a8e4e2d-8ab6-53cc-f98e-285ed22eca1e@quicinc.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 16:39:31 +0530
From: Naina Mehta <quic_nainmeht@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        <andersson@...nel.org>, <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        <bhupesh.sharma@...aro.org>
CC: <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: dts: qcom: sdx75-idp: add SDHCI for SD Card



On 5/17/2024 2:22 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/05/2024 07:21, Naina Mehta wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 5/15/2024 7:53 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 15/05/2024 14:09, Naina Mehta wrote:
>>>> Enable SDHCI on sdx75-idp to support SD card.
>>>> Also add the required regulators.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Naina Mehta <quic_nainmeht@...cinc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdx75-idp.dts | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdx75-idp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdx75-idp.dts
>>>> index f76e72fb2072..6f94278cf837 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdx75-idp.dts
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdx75-idp.dts
>>>> @@ -41,6 +41,29 @@
>>>>
>>>>    		vin-supply = <&vph_ext>;
>>>>    	};
>>>> +
>>>> +	vreg_sd_vccb: sd-vccb {
>>>
>>> Please use name for all fixed regulators which matches current format
>>> recommendation: 'regulator-[0-9]+v[0-9]+'
>>
>> Did you mean that vreg_sd_vdd should be updated according to the
>> suggested format because vreg_sd_vccb is not a fixed regulator?
>>
> 
> Yeah, it should be about sd-vdd, but then this one should be named as
> well with a similar prefix to have it consistent.

Sure, I will update in next revision.

Thanks,
Naina