[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878r08brmp.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 06:32:46 -0500
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
To: Jonathan Calmels <jcalmels@...0.net>
Cc: brauner@...nel.org, Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Kees Cook
<keescook@...omium.org>, Joel Granados <j.granados@...sung.com>, Serge
Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>, Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>, James
Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, Jarkko
Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, containers@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, keyrings@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] capabilities: user namespace capabilities
Jonathan Calmels <jcalmels@...0.net> writes:
> Attackers often rely on user namespaces to get elevated (yet confined)
> privileges in order to target specific subsystems (e.g. [1]). Distributions
> have been pretty adamant that they need a way to configure these, most of
> them carry out-of-tree patches to do so, or plainly refuse to enable
> them.
Pointers please?
That sentence sounds about 5 years out of date.
Eric
Powered by blists - more mailing lists