[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <etso5bvvs2gq3parvzukujgbatwqfb6lhzoxhenrapav6obbgl@o6lowhrcbucp>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 17:53:38 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
Cc: isaku.yamahata@...el.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, isaku.yamahata@...il.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
erdemaktas@...gle.com, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>, Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>, chen.bo@...el.com,
hang.yuan@...el.com, tina.zhang@...el.com, Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 039/130] KVM: TDX: initialize VM with TDX specific
parameters
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 04:37:16PM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 17.05.24 16:32, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 12:25:41AM -0800, isaku.yamahata@...el.com wrote:
> > > @@ -725,6 +967,17 @@ static int __init tdx_module_setup(void)
> > > tdx_info->nr_tdcs_pages = tdcs_base_size / PAGE_SIZE;
> > > + /*
> > > + * Make TDH.VP.ENTER preserve RBP so that the stack unwinder
> > > + * always work around it. Query the feature.
> > > + */
> > > + if (!(tdx_info->features0 & MD_FIELD_ID_FEATURES0_NO_RBP_MOD) &&
> > > + !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER)) {
> >
> > I think it supposed to be IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER). "!" shouldn't
> > be here.
>
> No, I don't think so.
>
> With CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER %rbp is being saved and restored, so there is no
> problem in case the seamcall is clobbering it.
Could you check setup_tdparams() in your tree?
Commit
[SEAM-WORKAROUND] KVM: TDX: Don't use NO_RBP_MOD for backward compatibility
in my tree comments out the setting TDX_CONTROL_FLAG_NO_RBP_MOD.
I now remember there was problem in EDK2 using RBP. So the patch is
temporary until EDK2 is fixed.
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists