linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6] can: mcp251xfd: fix infinite loop when xmit fails

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 17:32:12 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc: Vitor Soares <vitor.soares@...adex.com>, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Kopp <thomas.kopp@...rochip.com>,
	Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Vitor Soares <ivitro@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] can: mcp251xfd: fix infinite loop when xmit fails

On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 04:44:18PM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
> > This patch resolves the issue by starting …
> 
> Will further imperative wordings be more desirable for an improved change description?
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.9#n94
> 
> Regards,
> Markus
> 

Hi,

This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list.  I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore.  Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to
follow it at all.  The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by
almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of
behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and
inability to adapt to feedback.  Please feel free to also ignore emails
from them.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot