[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9cd7f179-673b-4e96-be08-128dc6fb6271@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 19:02:25 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/20] x86/tdx: Introduce tdvmcall_trampoline()
On 5/17/24 16:19, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> The function will be used from inline assembly to handle most TDVMCALL
> cases.
Perhaps add that the calling convention is designed to allow using the
asm constraints a/b/c/d/S/D and keep the asm blocks simpler?
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists