lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 10:38:44 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, 
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Hou Wenlong <houwenlong.hwl@...group.com>, Kechen Lu <kechenl@...dia.com>, 
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>, Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>, 
	Binbin Wu <binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com>, Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>, 
	Robert Hoo <robert.hoo.linux@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/49] KVM: selftests: Verify KVM stuffs runtime CPUID OS
 bits on CR4 writes

Extend x86's set sregs test to verify that KVM sets/clears OSXSAVE and
OSKPKE according to CR4.XSAVE and CR4.PKE respectively.  For performance
reasons, KVM is responsible for emulating the architectural behavior of
the OS CPUID bits tracking CR4.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/set_sregs_test.c | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/set_sregs_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/set_sregs_test.c
index 96fd690d479a..f4095a3d1278 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/set_sregs_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/set_sregs_test.c
@@ -85,6 +85,16 @@ static void test_cr_bits(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, uint64_t cr4)
 	rc = _vcpu_sregs_set(vcpu, &sregs);
 	TEST_ASSERT(!rc, "Failed to set supported CR4 bits (0x%lx)", cr4);
 
+	TEST_ASSERT(!!(sregs.cr4 & X86_CR4_OSXSAVE) ==
+		    (vcpu->cpuid && vcpu_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_OSXSAVE)),
+		    "KVM didn't %s OSXSAVE in CPUID as expected",
+		    (sregs.cr4 & X86_CR4_OSXSAVE) ? "set" : "clear");
+
+	TEST_ASSERT(!!(sregs.cr4 & X86_CR4_PKE) ==
+		    (vcpu->cpuid && vcpu_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_OSPKE)),
+		    "KVM didn't %s OSPKE in CPUID as expected",
+		    (sregs.cr4 & X86_CR4_PKE) ? "set" : "clear");
+
 	vcpu_sregs_get(vcpu, &sregs);
 	TEST_ASSERT(sregs.cr4 == cr4, "sregs.CR4 (0x%llx) != CR4 (0x%lx)",
 		    sregs.cr4, cr4);
-- 
2.45.0.215.g3402c0e53f-goog


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ