[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240518000430.1118488-1-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 17:04:21 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/9] KVM: x86: Fixes for KVM_INTEL_PROVE_VE
Fixes and debug help for prove #VE support. I'm not in love with the sanity
check implementation, but I also don't love the idea of plumbing in @kvm to
the low level SPTE helpers.
Not super well tested, but I wanted to get this posted asap in case someone
wants to debug the unexpected #VEs we're seeing.
Note, Isaku's patch needs his SoB.
Isaku Yamahata (1):
KVM: x86/mmu: Use SHADOW_NONPRESENT_VALUE for atomic zap in TDP MMU
Sean Christopherson (8):
KVM: nVMX: Initialize #VE info page for vmcs02 when proving #VE
support
KVM: nVMX: Always handle #VEs in L0 (never forward #VEs from L2 to L1)
KVM: x86/mmu: Add sanity checks that KVM doesn't create EPT #VE SPTEs
KVM: VMX: Dump VMCS on unexpected #VE
KVM: x86/mmu: Print SPTEs on unexpected #VE
KVM: VMX: Don't kill the VM on an unexpected #VE
KVM: VMX: Enumerate EPT Violation #VE support in /proc/cpuinfo
KVM: x86: Disable KVM_INTEL_PROVE_VE by default
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
arch/x86/include/asm/vmxfeatures.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig | 6 ++--
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h | 9 ++++++
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_iter.h | 2 ++
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 5 ++++
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 11 ++++++--
9 files changed, 67 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
base-commit: 4aad0b1893a141f114ba40ed509066f3c9bc24b0
--
2.45.0.215.g3402c0e53f-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists