linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 12/28] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw-proxy-client: add NAPI RX polling function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 17:37:39 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>,
	Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@...com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	MD Danish Anwar <danishanwar@...com>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>,
	Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	Misael Lopez Cruz <misael.lopez@...com>,
	Sriramakrishnan <srk@...com>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 12/28] net: ethernet: ti: cpsw-proxy-client:
 add NAPI RX polling function

On Sun, May 19, 2024 at 03:00:42PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> 
> FYI, Markus can be safely ignored.  His opinions are well-established as
> being irrelevant.

I personally would suggest ignoring the nit-gritty details for the
moment, and concentrate on the big picture architecture. I suspect the
basic architecture is wrong, and the code is going to change in big
ways. So it is pointless reviewing the code at the moment, other than
to understand the architecture.

	Andrew