linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] drm/msm/a6xx: request memory region

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4susqladik7qzknlggchehmfyzeaccc7j27jtpvgrfm4pc7bqk@weiwasipz674>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 11:16:30 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Kiarash Hajian <kiarash8112hajian@...il.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>, 
	Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>, Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, 
	Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, 
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, 
	freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] drm/msm/a6xx: request memory region

On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 05:03:53AM -0400, Kiarash Hajian wrote:
> The driver's memory regions are currently just ioremap()ed, but not
> reserved through a request. That's not a bug, but having the request is
> a little more robust.
> 
> Implement the region-request through the corresponding managed
> devres-function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kiarash Hajian <kiarash8112hajian@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - Combine v3 commits into a singel commit
> - Link to v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240512-msm-adreno-memory-region-v3-0-0a728ad45010@gmail.com
> 
> Changes in v3:
> - Remove redundant devm_iounmap calls, relying on devres for automatic resource cleanup.
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - update the subject prefix to "drm/msm/a6xx:", to match the majority of other changes to this file.
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c | 22 +---------------------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
> index 8bea8ef26f77..cf0b3b3d8f34 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c
> @@ -524,9 +524,6 @@ static void a6xx_gmu_rpmh_init(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu)
>  	uint32_t pdc_address_offset;
>  	bool pdc_in_aop = false;
>  
> -	if (IS_ERR(pdcptr))
> -		goto err;

So, if there is an error, we just continue through? What about the code
that accesses the region afterwards?

If error handling becomes void, then there should be an early return
instead of dropping the error check completely.

> -
>  	if (adreno_is_a650(adreno_gpu) ||
>  	    adreno_is_a660_family(adreno_gpu) ||
>  	    adreno_is_a7xx(adreno_gpu))
> @@ -540,8 +537,6 @@ static void a6xx_gmu_rpmh_init(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu)
>  
>  	if (!pdc_in_aop) {
>  		seqptr = a6xx_gmu_get_mmio(pdev, "gmu_pdc_seq");
> -		if (IS_ERR(seqptr))
> -			goto err;

Same question.

>  	}
>  
>  	/* Disable SDE clock gating */
> @@ -633,12 +628,6 @@ static void a6xx_gmu_rpmh_init(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu)
>  	wmb();
>  
>  	a6xx_rpmh_stop(gmu);
> -
> -err:
> -	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(pdcptr))
> -		iounmap(pdcptr);
> -	if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(seqptr))
> -		iounmap(seqptr);
>  }
>  
>  /*
> @@ -1503,7 +1492,7 @@ static void __iomem *a6xx_gmu_get_mmio(struct platform_device *pdev,
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = ioremap(res->start, resource_size(res));
> +	ret = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
>  	if (!ret) {
>  		DRM_DEV_ERROR(&pdev->dev, "Unable to map the %s registers\n", name);
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> @@ -1613,13 +1602,11 @@ int a6xx_gmu_wrapper_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node)
>  	gmu->mmio = a6xx_gmu_get_mmio(pdev, "gmu");
>  	if (IS_ERR(gmu->mmio)) {
>  		ret = PTR_ERR(gmu->mmio);
> -		goto err_mmio;

And this is even worse. See the comment below.

>  	}
>  
>  	gmu->cxpd = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(gmu->dev, "cx");
>  	if (IS_ERR(gmu->cxpd)) {
>  		ret = PTR_ERR(gmu->cxpd);
> -		goto err_mmio;
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!device_link_add(gmu->dev, gmu->cxpd, DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME)) {
> @@ -1635,7 +1622,6 @@ int a6xx_gmu_wrapper_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node)
>  	gmu->gxpd = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(gmu->dev, "gx");
>  	if (IS_ERR(gmu->gxpd)) {
>  		ret = PTR_ERR(gmu->gxpd);
> -		goto err_mmio;
>  	}
>  
>  	gmu->initialized = true;
> @@ -1645,9 +1631,6 @@ int a6xx_gmu_wrapper_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node)
>  detach_cxpd:
>  	dev_pm_domain_detach(gmu->cxpd, false);
>  
> -err_mmio:
> -	iounmap(gmu->mmio);
> -

You have dropped the iounmap(). However now the error path should
remain. The put_device() must be called. So fix the label name and just
drop the iounmap().

>  	/* Drop reference taken in of_find_device_by_node */
>  	put_device(gmu->dev);
>  
> @@ -1825,9 +1808,6 @@ int a6xx_gmu_init(struct a6xx_gpu *a6xx_gpu, struct device_node *node)
>  	dev_pm_domain_detach(gmu->cxpd, false);
>  
>  err_mmio:
> -	iounmap(gmu->mmio);
> -	if (platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "rscc"))
> -		iounmap(gmu->rscc);

Same comment here.

>  	free_irq(gmu->gmu_irq, gmu);
>  	free_irq(gmu->hfi_irq, gmu);
>  
> 
> ---
> base-commit: cf87f46fd34d6c19283d9625a7822f20d90b64a4
> change-id: 20240511-msm-adreno-memory-region-2bcb1c958621
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Kiarash Hajian <kiarash8112hajian@...il.com>
> 

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry