[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <604d8d9c-6b9d-4cd3-91e7-79923b044472@linux.intel.com>
Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 18:14:12 +0800
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>, "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
Joel Granados <j.granados@...sung.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, "iommu@...ts.linux.dev"
<iommu@...ts.linux.dev>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/9] iommu: Replace sva_iommu with iommu_attach_handle
On 5/15/24 3:21 PM, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2024 10:57 PM
>>
>> #else
>> -static inline struct iommu_sva *
>> +static inline struct iommu_attach_handle *
>> iommu_sva_bind_device(struct device *dev, struct mm_struct *mm)
>> {
>> - return NULL;
>> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>> }
>>
>
> this should be a separate fix.
Yes. It could be a fix.
>
> existing drivers (idxd and uacce) only check IS_ERR() on the return
> value. A Null pointer may lead to an error reported at a later point.
Though I don't think it could cause any real problem because this
interface should always be called after the sva enabling one.
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists