| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <a4cb6b6b-0105-4ba5-b43d-662ef96fbec6@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 15:36:33 +0800
From: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: libaokun@...weicloud.com, netfs@...ts.linux.dev, dhowells@...hat.com,
jlayton@...nel.org
Cc: hsiangkao@...ux.alibaba.com, zhujia.zj@...edance.com,
linux-erofs@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yangerkun@...wei.com, houtao1@...wei.com,
yukuai3@...wei.com, wozizhi@...wei.com, Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/12] cachefiles: fix slab-use-after-free in
cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read()
On 5/15/24 4:45 PM, libaokun@...weicloud.com wrote:
> From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
>
> We got the following issue in a fuzz test of randomly issuing the restore
> command:
>
> ==================================================================
> BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0xb41/0xb60
> Read of size 8 at addr ffff888122e84088 by task ondemand-04-dae/963
>
> CPU: 13 PID: 963 Comm: ondemand-04-dae Not tainted 6.8.0-dirty #564
> Call Trace:
> kasan_report+0x93/0xc0
> cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read+0xb41/0xb60
> vfs_read+0x169/0xb50
> ksys_read+0xf5/0x1e0
>
> Allocated by task 116:
> kmem_cache_alloc+0x140/0x3a0
> cachefiles_lookup_cookie+0x140/0xcd0
> fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x43c/0x1230
> [...]
>
> Freed by task 792:
> kmem_cache_free+0xfe/0x390
> cachefiles_put_object+0x241/0x480
> fscache_cookie_state_machine+0x5c8/0x1230
> [...]
> ==================================================================
>
> Following is the process that triggers the issue:
>
> mount | daemon_thread1 | daemon_thread2
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> cachefiles_withdraw_cookie
> cachefiles_ondemand_clean_object(object)
> cachefiles_ondemand_send_req
> REQ_A = kzalloc(sizeof(*req) + data_len)
> wait_for_completion(&REQ_A->done)
>
> cachefiles_daemon_read
> cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
> REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
> msg->object_id = req->object->ondemand->ondemand_id
> ------ restore ------
> cachefiles_ondemand_restore
> xas_for_each(&xas, req, ULONG_MAX)
> xas_set_mark(&xas, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW)
>
> cachefiles_daemon_read
> cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read
> REQ_A = cachefiles_ondemand_select_req
> copy_to_user(_buffer, msg, n)
> xa_erase(&cache->reqs, id)
> complete(&REQ_A->done)
> ------ close(fd) ------
> cachefiles_ondemand_fd_release
> cachefiles_put_object
> cachefiles_put_object
> kmem_cache_free(cachefiles_object_jar, object)
> REQ_A->object->ondemand->ondemand_id
> // object UAF !!!
>
> When we see the request within xa_lock, req->object must not have been
> freed yet, so grab the reference count of object before xa_unlock to
> avoid the above issue.
>
> Fixes: 0a7e54c1959c ("cachefiles: resend an open request if the read request's object is closed")
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@...wei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@...edance.com>
> ---
> fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c | 2 ++
> include/trace/events/cachefiles.h | 6 +++++-
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c b/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
> index 56d12fe4bf73..bb94ef6a6f61 100644
> --- a/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
> +++ b/fs/cachefiles/ondemand.c
> @@ -336,6 +336,7 @@ ssize_t cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read(struct cachefiles_cache *cache,
> xas_clear_mark(&xas, CACHEFILES_REQ_NEW);
> cache->req_id_next = xas.xa_index + 1;
> refcount_inc(&req->ref);
> + cachefiles_grab_object(req->object, cachefiles_obj_get_read_req);
> xa_unlock(&cache->reqs);
>
> if (msg->opcode == CACHEFILES_OP_OPEN) {
> @@ -355,6 +356,7 @@ ssize_t cachefiles_ondemand_daemon_read(struct cachefiles_cache *cache,
> close_fd(((struct cachefiles_open *)msg->data)->fd);
> }
> out:
> + cachefiles_put_object(req->object, cachefiles_obj_put_read_req);
> /* Remove error request and CLOSE request has no reply */
> if (ret || msg->opcode == CACHEFILES_OP_CLOSE) {
> xas_reset(&xas);
> diff --git a/include/trace/events/cachefiles.h b/include/trace/events/cachefiles.h
> index cf4b98b9a9ed..119a823fb5a0 100644
> --- a/include/trace/events/cachefiles.h
> +++ b/include/trace/events/cachefiles.h
> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ enum cachefiles_obj_ref_trace {
> cachefiles_obj_see_withdrawal,
> cachefiles_obj_get_ondemand_fd,
> cachefiles_obj_put_ondemand_fd,
> + cachefiles_obj_get_read_req,
> + cachefiles_obj_put_read_req,
How about cachefiles_obj_[get|put]_ondemand_read, so that it could be
easily identified as ondemand mode at the first glance?
> };
>
> enum fscache_why_object_killed {
> @@ -127,7 +129,9 @@ enum cachefiles_error_trace {
> EM(cachefiles_obj_see_lookup_cookie, "SEE lookup_cookie") \
> EM(cachefiles_obj_see_lookup_failed, "SEE lookup_failed") \
> EM(cachefiles_obj_see_withdraw_cookie, "SEE withdraw_cookie") \
> - E_(cachefiles_obj_see_withdrawal, "SEE withdrawal")
> + EM(cachefiles_obj_see_withdrawal, "SEE withdrawal") \
> + EM(cachefiles_obj_get_read_req, "GET read_req") \
> + E_(cachefiles_obj_put_read_req, "PUT read_req")
Ditto.
Otherwise, LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@...ux.alibaba.com>
--
Thanks,
Jingbo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists