[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f42ef151-6eee-418f-91e1-5ac08d161119@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 11:55:43 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
MandyJH Liu <mandyjh.liu@...iatek.com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8365: use a specific SCPSYS
compatible
Il 18/05/24 23:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
> SoCs should use dedicated compatibles for each of their syscon nodes to
> precisely describe the block. Using an incorrect compatible does not
> allow to properly match/validate children of the syscon device. Replace
> SYSCFG compatible, which does not have children, with a new dedicated
> one for SCPSYS block.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Technically, that's not a SCPSYS block, but called SYSCFG in MT8365, but the
meaning and the functioning is the same, so it's fine for me.
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists