[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZktAmvpBfk-IrMr9@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 14:22:50 +0200
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk v5 12/30] serial: core: Implement processing in
port->lock wrapper
On Thu 2024-05-02 23:44:21, John Ogness wrote:
> Currently the port->lock wrappers uart_port_lock(),
> uart_port_unlock() (and their variants) only lock/unlock
> the spin_lock.
>
> If the port is an nbcon console, the wrappers must also
> acquire/release the console and mark the region as unsafe. This
> allows general port->lock synchronization to be synchronized
> with the nbcon console ownership.
>
> Note that __uart_port_using_nbcon() relies on the port->lock
> being held while a console is added and removed from the
> console list (i.e. all uart nbcon drivers *must* take the
> port->lock in their device_lock() callbacks).
>
> Signed-off-by: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists