[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240520-discard-fanatic-f8e686a4faad@spud>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 18:17:52 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: "Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@...com>
Cc: vigneshr@...com, nm@...com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kip Broadhurst <kbroadhurst@...com>, w.egorov@...tec.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: net: dp8386x: Add MIT license along with
GPL-2.0
On Sat, May 18, 2024 at 02:18:55PM +0530, Kumar, Udit wrote:
> Hi Conor
>
> On 5/17/2024 8:11 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 03:39:20PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 04:12:26PM +0530, Udit Kumar wrote:
> > > > Modify license to include dual licensing as GPL-2.0-only OR MIT
> > > > license for TI specific phy header files. This allows for Linux
> > > > kernel files to be used in other Operating System ecosystems
> > > > such as Zephyr or FreeBSD.
> > > What's wrong with BSD-2-Clause, why not use that?
> > I cut myself off, I meant to say:
> > What's wrong with BSD-2-Clause, the standard dual license for
> > bindings, why not use that?
>
> want to be inline with License of top level DTS, which is including this
> header file
Unless there's a specific reason to use MIT (like your legal won't even
allow you to use BSD-2-Clause) then please just use the normal license
for bindings here.
Cheers,
Conor.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists