lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <171623322336.94469.13172149100331733795.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 20:27:03 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Shenghao Ding <shenghao-ding@...com>
Cc: andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, lgirdwood@...il.com, perex@...ex.cz, 
 pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com, 13916275206@....com, 
 alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
 liam.r.girdwood@...el.com, bard.liao@...el.com, 
 yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com, kevin-lu@...com, 
 cameron.berkenpas@...il.com, tiwai@...e.de, baojun.xu@...com, soyer@....hu, 
 Baojun.Xu@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] ASoC: tas2781: Fix wrong loading calibrated data
 sequence

On Sat, 18 May 2024 22:15:46 +0800, Shenghao Ding wrote:
> Calibrated data will be set to default after loading DSP config params,
> which will cause speaker protection work abnormally. Reload calibrated
> data after loading DSP config params. Remove declaration of unused API
> which load calibrated data in wrong sequence, changed the copyright year
> and correct file name in license
> header.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: tas2781: Fix wrong loading calibrated data sequence
      commit: b195acf5266d2dee4067f89345c3e6b88d925311

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ