linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Add properties for i.MX95 Pinctrl OEM extensions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 14:49:42 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
Cc: linus.walleij@...aro.org, sudeep.holla@....com,
	cristian.marussi@....com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
	conor+dt@...nel.org, shawnguo@...nel.org, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, festevam@...il.com,
	imx@...ts.linux.dev, aisheng.dong@....com,
	Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] dt-bindings: firmware: arm,scmi: Add properties for i.MX95
 Pinctrl OEM extensions

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 03:30:12PM +0800, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> 
> i.MX95 Pinctrl is managed by System Control Management Interface(SCMI)
> firmware using OEM extensions. No functions, no groups are provided by
> the firmware. So add i.MX95 specific properties.
> 
> To keep aligned with current i.MX pinctrl bindings, still use "fsl,pins"
> for i.MX95.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> ---
> 
> V1:
>  There is already a v6 version for i.MX95 pinctrl with binding got reviewed by
>  Rob, https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240513-pinctrl-scmi-oem-v3-v6-1-904975c99cc4@nxp.com/
>  But after NXP internal discussion, to keep "fsl,pins" for i.MX95 would make
>  it aligned with current i.MX93/8M/7 bindings which people are familiar with,
>  and easy to understand.
> 
>  Sorry to bring back so late after your reviewing in previous generic binding
>  patch. This is not to reject the v6 patch, just wanna to see whether you are
>  happy with "fsl,pins" for i.MX95. If people are happy to accept, I will post
>  out driver together with this patch in new patchset to reject v6. If people are
>  not happy, we could continue with v6.

It is fine for me.

Rob