[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240520.221843-swanky.buyers.maroon.prison-MAgYEXR0vg7P@cyphar.com>
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 16:27:59 -0600
From: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>, Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] fhandle: expose u64 mount id to name_to_handle_at(2)
On 2024-05-20, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 2024-05-20 at 17:35 -0400, Aleksa Sarai wrote:
> > Now that we have stabilised the unique 64-bit mount ID interface in
> > statx, we can now provide a race-free way for name_to_handle_at(2) to
> > provide a file handle and corresponding mount without needing to worry
> > about racing with /proc/mountinfo parsing.
> >
> > As with AT_HANDLE_FID, AT_HANDLE_UNIQUE_MNT_ID reuses a statx AT_* bit
> > that doesn't make sense for name_to_handle_at(2).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
> > ---
> > fs/fhandle.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
> > include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h | 2 ++
> > 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/fhandle.c b/fs/fhandle.c
> > index 8a7f86c2139a..6bc7ffccff8c 100644
> > --- a/fs/fhandle.c
> > +++ b/fs/fhandle.c
> > @@ -16,7 +16,8 @@
> >
> > static long do_sys_name_to_handle(const struct path *path,
> > struct file_handle __user *ufh,
> > - int __user *mnt_id, int fh_flags)
> > + void __user *mnt_id, bool unique_mntid,
> > + int fh_flags)
> > {
> > long retval;
> > struct file_handle f_handle;
> > @@ -69,10 +70,16 @@ static long do_sys_name_to_handle(const struct path *path,
> > } else
> > retval = 0;
> > /* copy the mount id */
> > - if (put_user(real_mount(path->mnt)->mnt_id, mnt_id) ||
> > - copy_to_user(ufh, handle,
> > - struct_size(handle, f_handle, handle_bytes)))
> > - retval = -EFAULT;
> > + if (unique_mntid)
> > + retval = put_user(real_mount(path->mnt)->mnt_id_unique,
> > + (u64 __user *) mnt_id);
> > + else
> > + retval = put_user(real_mount(path->mnt)->mnt_id,
> > + (int __user *) mnt_id);
> > + /* copy the handle */
> > + if (!retval)
> > + retval = copy_to_user(ufh, handle,
> > + struct_size(handle, f_handle, handle_bytes));
> > kfree(handle);
> > return retval;
> > }
> > @@ -83,6 +90,7 @@ static long do_sys_name_to_handle(const struct path *path,
> > * @name: name that should be converted to handle.
> > * @handle: resulting file handle
> > * @mnt_id: mount id of the file system containing the file
> > + * (u64 if AT_HANDLE_UNIQUE_MNT_ID, otherwise int)
> > * @flag: flag value to indicate whether to follow symlink or not
> > * and whether a decodable file handle is required.
> > *
> > @@ -92,7 +100,7 @@ static long do_sys_name_to_handle(const struct path *path,
> > * value required.
> > */
> > SYSCALL_DEFINE5(name_to_handle_at, int, dfd, const char __user *, name,
> > - struct file_handle __user *, handle, int __user *, mnt_id,
> > + struct file_handle __user *, handle, void __user *, mnt_id,
> >
>
> Changing the syscall signature like this is rather nasty. The new flag
> seems like it should safely gate the difference, but I still have some
> concerns about misuse and people passing in too small a buffer for the
> mnt_id.
Yeah, it's a little ugly, but an name_to_handle_at2 feels like overkill
for such a minor change. I'm also not sure there's a huge risk of users
accidentally passing AT_HANDLE_UNIQUE_MNT_ID with an (int *).
> > int, flag)
> > {
> > struct path path;
> > @@ -100,7 +108,8 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(name_to_handle_at, int, dfd, const char __user *, name,
> > int fh_flags;
> > int err;
> >
> > - if (flag & ~(AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW | AT_EMPTY_PATH | AT_HANDLE_FID))
> > + if (flag & ~(AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW | AT_EMPTY_PATH | AT_HANDLE_FID |
> > + AT_HANDLE_UNIQUE_MNT_ID))
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > lookup_flags = (flag & AT_SYMLINK_FOLLOW) ? LOOKUP_FOLLOW : 0;
> > @@ -109,7 +118,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE5(name_to_handle_at, int, dfd, const char __user *, name,
> > lookup_flags |= LOOKUP_EMPTY;
> > err = user_path_at(dfd, name, lookup_flags, &path);
> > if (!err) {
> > - err = do_sys_name_to_handle(&path, handle, mnt_id, fh_flags);
> > + err = do_sys_name_to_handle(&path, handle, mnt_id,
> > + flag & AT_HANDLE_UNIQUE_MNT_ID,
> > + fh_flags);
> > path_put(&path);
> > }
> > return err;
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h b/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h
> > index c0bcc185fa48..fda970f92fba 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/fcntl.h
> > @@ -118,6 +118,8 @@
> > #define AT_HANDLE_FID AT_REMOVEDIR /* file handle is needed to
> > compare object identity and may not
> > be usable to open_by_handle_at(2) */
> > +#define AT_HANDLE_UNIQUE_MNT_ID AT_STATX_FORCE_SYNC /* returned mount id is
> > + the u64 unique mount id */
> > #if defined(__KERNEL__)
> > #define AT_GETATTR_NOSEC 0x80000000
> > #endif
> >
> > ---
> > base-commit: 584bbf439d0fa83d728ec49f3a38c581bdc828b4
> > change-id: 20240515-exportfs-u64-mount-id-9ebb5c58b53c
> >
> > Best regards,
>
> --
> Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
>
--
Aleksa Sarai
Senior Software Engineer (Containers)
SUSE Linux GmbH
<https://www.cyphar.com/>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists