| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20240521194916.1897909-2-tgamblin@baylibre.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 15:49:15 -0400
From: Trevor Gamblin <tgamblin@...libre.com>
To: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
michael.hennerich@...log.com,
nuno.sa@...log.com,
tgamblin@...libre.com,
dlechner@...libre.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/2 v3] pwm: add duty offset support
Some PWM chips support a "phase" or "duty_offset" feature. This patch
continues adding support for configuring this property in the PWM
subsystem.
Functions duty_offset_show(), duty_offset_store(), and
pwm_get_duty_offset() are added to match what exists for duty_cycle.
Add a check to disallow applying a state with both inversed polarity and
a nonzero duty_offset.
Also add duty_offset to TP_printk in include/trace/events/pwm.h so that
it is reported with other properties when using the event tracing pipe
for debug.
Signed-off-by: Trevor Gamblin <tgamblin@...libre.com>
---
v3 changes:
* rebased on top of latest pwm/for-next
* removed changes related to cdev to match current pwm tree
* fixed minor whitespace issue caught by checkpatch
v2 changes:
* Address feedback for driver in v1:
* Remove line setting supports_offset flag in pwm_chip, since that has
been removed from the struct in core.c.
---
drivers/pwm/core.c | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
include/linux/pwm.h | 15 ++++++++
include/trace/events/pwm.h | 6 ++-
3 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/core.c b/drivers/pwm/core.c
index 18574857641e..2ebfc7f3de8a 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/core.c
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ static void pwm_apply_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm,
*/
if (s1.enabled && s1.polarity != state->polarity) {
s2.polarity = state->polarity;
+ s2.duty_offset = s1.duty_cycle;
s2.duty_cycle = s1.period - s1.duty_cycle;
s2.period = s1.period;
s2.enabled = s1.enabled;
@@ -103,6 +104,23 @@ static void pwm_apply_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm,
state->duty_cycle, state->period,
s2.duty_cycle, s2.period);
+ if (state->enabled &&
+ last->polarity == state->polarity &&
+ last->period == s2.period &&
+ last->duty_offset > s2.duty_offset &&
+ last->duty_offset <= state->duty_offset)
+ dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip),
+ ".apply didn't pick the best available duty offset (requested: %llu/%llu, applied: %llu/%llu, possible: %llu/%llu)\n",
+ state->duty_offset, state->period,
+ s2.duty_offset, s2.period,
+ last->duty_offset, last->period);
+
+ if (state->enabled && state->duty_offset < s2.duty_offset)
+ dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip),
+ ".apply is supposed to round down duty_offset (requested: %llu/%llu, applied: %llu/%llu)\n",
+ state->duty_offset, state->period,
+ s2.duty_offset, s2.period);
+
if (!state->enabled && s2.enabled && s2.duty_cycle > 0)
dev_warn(pwmchip_parent(chip),
"requested disabled, but yielded enabled with duty > 0\n");
@@ -126,12 +144,13 @@ static void pwm_apply_debug(struct pwm_device *pwm,
if (s1.enabled != last->enabled ||
s1.polarity != last->polarity ||
(s1.enabled && s1.period != last->period) ||
+ (s1.enabled && s1.duty_offset != last->duty_offset) ||
(s1.enabled && s1.duty_cycle != last->duty_cycle)) {
dev_err(pwmchip_parent(chip),
- ".apply is not idempotent (ena=%d pol=%d %llu/%llu) -> (ena=%d pol=%d %llu/%llu)\n",
+ ".apply is not idempotent (ena=%d pol=%d %llu/%llu/%llu) -> (ena=%d pol=%d %llu/%llu/%llu)\n",
s1.enabled, s1.polarity, s1.duty_cycle, s1.period,
- last->enabled, last->polarity, last->duty_cycle,
- last->period);
+ s1.duty_offset, last->enabled, last->polarity,
+ last->duty_cycle, last->period, last->duty_offset);
}
}
@@ -146,13 +165,24 @@ static int __pwm_apply(struct pwm_device *pwm, const struct pwm_state *state)
int err;
if (!pwm || !state || !state->period ||
- state->duty_cycle > state->period)
+ state->duty_cycle > state->period ||
+ state->duty_offset > state->period)
return -EINVAL;
chip = pwm->chip;
+ /*
+ * There is no need to set duty_offset with inverse polarity,
+ * since signals with duty_offset values greater than 0.5 *
+ * period can equivalently be represented by an inverted signal
+ * without offset.
+ */
+ if (state->polarity == PWM_POLARITY_INVERSED && state->duty_offset)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
if (state->period == pwm->state.period &&
state->duty_cycle == pwm->state.duty_cycle &&
+ state->duty_offset == pwm->state.duty_offset &&
state->polarity == pwm->state.polarity &&
state->enabled == pwm->state.enabled &&
state->usage_power == pwm->state.usage_power)
@@ -246,10 +276,11 @@ int pwm_adjust_config(struct pwm_device *pwm)
* been configured.
*
* In either case, we setup the new period and polarity, and assign a
- * duty cycle of 0.
+ * duty cycle and offset of 0.
*/
if (!state.period) {
state.duty_cycle = 0;
+ state.duty_offset = 0;
state.period = pargs.period;
state.polarity = pargs.polarity;
@@ -555,6 +586,41 @@ static ssize_t duty_cycle_store(struct device *pwm_dev,
return ret ? : size;
}
+static ssize_t duty_offset_show(struct device *pwm_dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr,
+ char *buf)
+{
+ const struct pwm_device *pwm = pwm_from_dev(pwm_dev);
+ struct pwm_state state;
+
+ pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
+
+ return sysfs_emit(buf, "%llu\n", state.duty_offset);
+}
+
+static ssize_t duty_offset_store(struct device *pwm_dev,
+ struct device_attribute *attr,
+ const char *buf, size_t size)
+{
+ struct pwm_export *export = pwmexport_from_dev(pwm_dev);
+ struct pwm_device *pwm = export->pwm;
+ struct pwm_state state;
+ u64 val;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = kstrtou64(buf, 0, &val);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ mutex_lock(&export->lock);
+ pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
+ state.duty_offset = val;
+ ret = pwm_apply_might_sleep(pwm, &state);
+ mutex_unlock(&export->lock);
+
+ return ret ? : size;
+}
+
static ssize_t enable_show(struct device *pwm_dev,
struct device_attribute *attr,
char *buf)
@@ -669,6 +735,7 @@ static ssize_t capture_show(struct device *pwm_dev,
static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(period);
static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(duty_cycle);
+static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(duty_offset);
static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(enable);
static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(polarity);
static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(capture);
@@ -676,6 +743,7 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(capture);
static struct attribute *pwm_attrs[] = {
&dev_attr_period.attr,
&dev_attr_duty_cycle.attr,
+ &dev_attr_duty_offset.attr,
&dev_attr_enable.attr,
&dev_attr_polarity.attr,
&dev_attr_capture.attr,
@@ -1639,6 +1707,7 @@ static void pwm_dbg_show(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct seq_file *s)
seq_printf(s, " period: %llu ns", state.period);
seq_printf(s, " duty: %llu ns", state.duty_cycle);
+ seq_printf(s, " duty_offset: %llu ns", state.duty_offset);
seq_printf(s, " polarity: %s",
state.polarity ? "inverse" : "normal");
diff --git a/include/linux/pwm.h b/include/linux/pwm.h
index 60b92c2c75ef..03e3fc00d236 100644
--- a/include/linux/pwm.h
+++ b/include/linux/pwm.h
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ enum {
* struct pwm_state - state of a PWM channel
* @period: PWM period (in nanoseconds)
* @duty_cycle: PWM duty cycle (in nanoseconds)
+ * @duty_offset: PWM duty offset (in nanoseconds)
* @polarity: PWM polarity
* @enabled: PWM enabled status
* @usage_power: If set, the PWM driver is only required to maintain the power
@@ -60,6 +61,7 @@ enum {
struct pwm_state {
u64 period;
u64 duty_cycle;
+ u64 duty_offset;
enum pwm_polarity polarity;
bool enabled;
bool usage_power;
@@ -129,6 +131,15 @@ static inline u64 pwm_get_duty_cycle(const struct pwm_device *pwm)
return state.duty_cycle;
}
+static inline u64 pwm_get_duty_offset(const struct pwm_device *pwm)
+{
+ struct pwm_state state;
+
+ pwm_get_state(pwm, &state);
+
+ return state.duty_offset;
+}
+
static inline enum pwm_polarity pwm_get_polarity(const struct pwm_device *pwm)
{
struct pwm_state state;
@@ -160,6 +171,9 @@ static inline void pwm_get_args(const struct pwm_device *pwm,
* ->duty_cycle value exceed the pwm_args->period one, which would trigger
* an error if the user calls pwm_apply_might_sleep() without adjusting ->duty_cycle
* first.
+ *
+ * ->duty_offset is likewise set to zero to avoid inconsistent default
+ * states.
*/
static inline void pwm_init_state(const struct pwm_device *pwm,
struct pwm_state *state)
@@ -175,6 +189,7 @@ static inline void pwm_init_state(const struct pwm_device *pwm,
state->period = args.period;
state->polarity = args.polarity;
state->duty_cycle = 0;
+ state->duty_offset = 0;
state->usage_power = false;
}
diff --git a/include/trace/events/pwm.h b/include/trace/events/pwm.h
index 12b35e4ff917..2d25ac5de816 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/pwm.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/pwm.h
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(pwm,
__field(struct pwm_device *, pwm)
__field(u64, period)
__field(u64, duty_cycle)
+ __field(u64, duty_offset)
__field(enum pwm_polarity, polarity)
__field(bool, enabled)
__field(int, err)
@@ -27,13 +28,14 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(pwm,
__entry->pwm = pwm;
__entry->period = state->period;
__entry->duty_cycle = state->duty_cycle;
+ __entry->duty_offset = state->duty_offset;
__entry->polarity = state->polarity;
__entry->enabled = state->enabled;
__entry->err = err;
),
- TP_printk("%p: period=%llu duty_cycle=%llu polarity=%d enabled=%d err=%d",
- __entry->pwm, __entry->period, __entry->duty_cycle,
+ TP_printk("%p: period=%llu duty_cycle=%llu duty_offset=%llu polarity=%d enabled=%d err=%d",
+ __entry->pwm, __entry->period, __entry->duty_cycle, __entry->duty_offset,
__entry->polarity, __entry->enabled, __entry->err)
);
--
2.45.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists