linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] large folios swap-in: handle refault cases first

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20240521145923.ae30d52cec3e9d9f00969cf7@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 14:59:23 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com, chrisl@...nel.org,
 david@...hat.com, hanchuanhua@...o.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
 hughd@...gle.com, kasong@...cent.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 ryan.roberts@....com, surenb@...gle.com, v-songbaohua@...o.com,
 willy@...radead.org, xiang@...nel.org, ying.huang@...el.com,
 yosryahmed@...gle.com, yuzhao@...gle.com, ziy@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] large folios swap-in: handle refault cases first

On Wed, 22 May 2024 09:21:38 +1200 Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com> wrote:

> This patchset missed the merge window, but I've tried and found that it still
> applies cleanly to today's mm-unstable. Would you like me to resend it or just
> proceed with using this v4 version?

It's in my post merge window backlog pile.  I'll let you know when I
get to it ;)