lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240521225918.2147-1-hdanton@sina.com>
Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 06:59:18 +0800
From: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bpf, sockmap: defer sk_psock_free_link() using RCU

On Tue, 21 May 2024 08:38:52 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
> On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 12:22=E2=80=AFAM Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
> > --- a/net/core/sock_map.c
> > +++ b/net/core/sock_map.c
> > @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ static void sock_map_del_link(struct sock *sk,
> >         bool strp_stop =3D false, verdict_stop =3D false;
> >         struct sk_psock_link *link, *tmp;
> >
> > +       rcu_read_lock();
> >         spin_lock_bh(&psock->link_lock);
> 
> I think this is incorrect.
> spin_lock_bh may sleep in RT and it won't be safe to do in rcu cs.

Could you specify why it won't be safe in rcu cs if you are right?
What does rcu look like in RT if not nothing?
> 
> pw-bot: cr

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ