[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+ak6D2tY0b8JOFq4kKvfPRtv+GkFFE23jc6qTrx6mTqVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 06:43:19 +0200
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
syzbot <syzbot+0438378d6f157baae1a2@...kaller.appspotmail.com>, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, Aleksandr Nogikh <nogikh@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [syzbot] [wireless?] WARNING in kcov_remote_start (3)
On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 at 12:56, Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 12:45 PM Johannes Berg
> <johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2024-03-28 at 04:00 -0700, syzbot wrote:
> > >
> > > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > > WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 2400 at kernel/kcov.c:860 kcov_remote_start+0x549/0x7e0 kernel/kcov.c:860
> >
> > This is
> >
> > /*
> > * Check that kcov_remote_start() is not called twice in background
> > * threads nor called by user tasks (with enabled kcov).
> > */
> > mode = READ_ONCE(t->kcov_mode);
> > if (WARN_ON(in_task() && kcov_mode_enabled(mode))) {
> > local_unlock_irqrestore(&kcov_percpu_data.lock, flags);
> > return;
> > }
> >
> > but I have no idea what that even means?
> >
> > > Workqueue: events_unbound cfg80211_wiphy_work
> > > RIP: 0010:kcov_remote_start+0x549/0x7e0 kernel/kcov.c:860
> > ...
> > > Call Trace:
> > > <TASK>
> > > kcov_remote_start_common include/linux/kcov.h:48 [inline]
> > > ieee80211_iface_work+0x21f/0xf10 net/mac80211/iface.c:1654
> > > cfg80211_wiphy_work+0x221/0x260 net/wireless/core.c:437
> > > process_one_work kernel/workqueue.c:3218 [inline]
> > > process_scheduled_works+0xa2c/0x1830 kernel/workqueue.c:3299
> > > worker_thread+0x86d/0xd70 kernel/workqueue.c:3380
> >
> > It's a worker thread. Was this not intended to be called in threads?
>
> I think the problem is that the KCOV annotations in the NFC code are
> buggy: kcov_remote_stop() is never called if the loop in nci_rx_work()
> exits on one of the breaks. With the recent addition of the nci_plen()
> check, this started happening often. But breaks existed in the loop
> before that too.
>
> We need to move kcov_remote_stop() into the loop and call it every
> time the loop exits.
>
> Dmitry, could you PTAL and confirm this? You added the annotation for
> NFC, AFAICS.
Missed this before somehow.
The other breaks seems to be from the switch, so should be fine:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.9-rc6/source/net/nfc/nci/core.c#L1528
Tetsuo, thanks for fixing it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists