[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 18:02:34 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Kai Huang <kai.huang@...el.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] KVM: nVMX: Initialize #VE info page for vmcs02 when
proving #VE support
On Tue, May 21, 2024, Kai Huang wrote:
> But now L0 always handles #VE exits from L2, and AFAICT L0 will just kill
> the L1, until the patch:
>
> KVM: VMX: Don't kill the VM on an unexpected #VE
>
> lands.
>
> So looks that patch at least should be done first. Otherwise it doesn't
> make a lot sense to kill L1 for #VE exits from L2.
I have no objection to changing the order.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists